poezie, proză, muzică, arte plastice, foto, video, evenimente
I think it is safe to assume that in the life's evolution on Earth, sex did not come into the scene at first, as a procreative solution, because it's a leap too far from cellular division, to sexual reproduction. This is not how evolution works. It must have been some intermediary stage.
So what was this intermediary stage? Let's imagine a primitive form of life living in the primordial soup. This form of life must have had two necesities to fulfill, one of them being the need for safety, and the other one the need to feed. Now as you can guess, those two necesities did not always got along. Searching for nutrients implies taking risks, it sacrifices comfort, and it's energy draining.So these two needs must have been in a constant battle with each other, each taking turn in controlling the organism's actions.Let's assume that in an initial stage, that primordial organism developed some tentacles that helped him search a larger area for nutrients without moving too much.Those tentacles also served as a warning mechanism that signaled the organism if it was getting to close to highly, uncomfortable, dangerous zones.The tentacles where good but not good enough.So now the organism goes to phase two. It releases the tentacles from it's body turning them into semi-independent organisms, which role was to search the enviroment for nutrients and bring them back to the mother organism.But how it could control these suborganisms?
Well this is where sex comes into play.Those small independent organisms, former tentacles,did not have the ability to process the nutrients, and turn them into energy, so they where forced to bring them back to the mother organism receiving in exchange energy(under the form of a chemical reaction maybe ?).These small semi-independent organisms were,in my opinion, the first males.From there on male/female psihological characteristics developed around these two separated organisms.Later on these two organisms came together again,both "the new male" and "the new female" (organisms that contained both the male, and the female within them) developed their own strategies of adaptation (satying alive and fed) starting from what they already had and sex become a procreative solution.This is how i think sex appeared in the scene.
There are many observations I made over the years, that seems to support this theory, for instance pleasure, all kinds, not only sexual(because all kind of pleasure are linked and evolved from the sexual kind) gives you energy, confidence in your masculine self seem to be boosted. However when you make love (not sex) you feel drained of energy, the explanation, is that when you make love it's your feminine self that is involved, not your masculine. Also when you boast and people admire you, you feel energized,but showing admiration for someone who is boasting, is energy draining. My opinion is that when your girlfriend is asking you to listen to her, she actualy wants to fuck you,she wants to sell you ideas, and wisdom for admiration, and when you are clearly not interested, but she still insist for you to listen to her, she wants to rape you :))).And then why boyfriends are not usually interested in fucking their girlfriends in this "methaphisical" manner ? Because in his deep inner self a man sexual instinct is usually oriented at the group,at all females,not at a particular individual one (see "The Hero" complex below).If you observe a group of male adolescents talking it's like a contest,everyone wants to fuck.I don't know about girls..and anyway there are much more to be said about the subject and i'm not in the mood right now :).Somehow I hope you will help me clarify the problem.
Adaugă un comentariu